How to build a Gantt Chart with the Google Charts API
The Google Charts API is an excellent way to add high quality charting to your web application. We first started working with the API as part of the Simpli5 dashboard development, and were quite impressed with its functionality and ease of use. Wrapper classes were developed and added to our Sandstone Application Framework to make the addition charts to Simpli5 and other applications as simple as possible.
An application we are developing for a client requires some graphic representation of progress along a timeline of multiple steps. A Gantt Chart is the obvious best solution, but alas that is not a chart type available from the Google API. However, a Gantt chart is really just a special type of bar chart, and bar charts are available in the API. So the question was, how can we make the standard Google bar chart display as a Gantt?
The Google Charting API Developer’s Guide does an excellent job documenting the “how” side of things, so to avoid repeating a lot of stuff from there, we’ll just focus on the “what” of building a Gantt chart with Google.
Google Chart’s Resolution
A few days ago I posted my frustrations with Google’s charting API security. While I still believe there are some issues that would plague banks, government and other institutions that have highly sensitive data, I have found a solution to our problem.
Google Charting Frustrations
Last week Google released its Charting API which generates PNG based image graphs for your data. The data is passed to them through a URL and returns the image data.
Placing this image tag in your HTML will generate the following graph.
Worldmapper – Trending the globe
I am fascinated by the different ways people represent data. We grow accustomed to displaying data in the same old ways. We start to glance over the mundane bar graphs we see everyday. We forget that the relationship between the data is more important than the specific numerical values. Graphs are for trends, reports are for numbers.
Worldmapper takes the same old data we hear every day in the news and dares to present it uniquely. I think it makes their point well.
Search
Popular Posts
- 50 Tips To A User Friendly Website
- My Favorite Pomodoro Timers
- Why Flash is Mostly Bad
- Sharing the Grid
- 10 Tips to Better Google Wave Conversations
- The difference between User Research and Usability Testing?
- How to Label Submit Buttons
- Our New Development Process
- Paper Prototyping vs. Balsamiq Mockups
- Review: Easy PHP Websites with the Zend Framework
Latest Comments
- Nate Klaiber → “ The design industry is plagued with the misconception that product manuals are evil. These designers believe that your product should be intuitive enough to use without a manual. While there is a certain truth to this, there are many viable reasons for product manuals to be used. There needs to be a certain…”
- Joe Fiorini → “ The design industry is plagued with the misconception that product manuals are evil. These designers believe that your product should be intuitive enough to use without a manual. While there is a certain truth to this, there are many viable reasons for product manuals to be used. There needs to be a certain…”
- Roger F Carver → “ The Google Charts API is an excellent way to add high quality charting to your web application. We first started working with the API as part of the Simpli5 dashboard development, and were quite impressed with its functionality and ease of use. Wrapper classes were developed and added to our Sandstone Application Framework to make…”
- Nate Klaiber → “ The “I agree” checkbox has become an interface standard on registration forms. “I agree to the terms and conditions.” While it’s purpose is generally understood by the consumer, it is a key source of frustration for people registering for accounts. eBay's Registration, as an example Why it’s overlooked: Checkboxes are small, particularly ones which aren’t grouped…”
- Josh Walsh → “ Most of the value you gain from a usability testing session comes from the analysis after the session is complete. I have been involved in a few sessions recently where no formal analysis has been conducted. I believe this is a mistake. Traditionally, the analysis portion of a usability session takes quite a long…”