<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon.com Redesigned for the better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designinginteractive.com/design/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designinginteractive.com/design/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/</link>
	<description>Usable Web Applications with Web Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mau Sandoval</title>
		<link>http://www.designinginteractive.com/design/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mau Sandoval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designinginteractive.com/featured/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that finding the &#039;login page&#039; is difficult.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The interesting thing is that they made it difficult by following one web usability rule:  Do not use verbs on links.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look around and all the &#039;sign in&#039; references are not linked unless they are a button (buttons should be actions).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, they break the &#039;no verbs&#039; rule immediately after the &#039;personalized recommendations&#039;: New Customer? &#039;Start Here&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And they made it quite awkward for us to understand that they want to give us personalized recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe they could&#039;ve said: &quot;Sign in to access Your Amazon.com&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am a frequent Amazon.com user and I have been having a bit of a hard time getting used to it: I always log in (until I read this article) via &#039;Your Account&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that finding the &#8216;login page&#8217; is difficult.</p>
<p>The interesting thing is that they made it difficult by following one web usability rule:  Do not use verbs on links.</p>
<p>Look around and all the &#8216;sign in&#8217; references are not linked unless they are a button (buttons should be actions).</p>
<p>However, they break the &#8216;no verbs&#8217; rule immediately after the &#8216;personalized recommendations&#8217;: New Customer? &#8216;Start Here&#8217;.</p>
<p>And they made it quite awkward for us to understand that they want to give us personalized recommendations.</p>
<p>Maybe they could&#8217;ve said: &#8220;Sign in to access Your Amazon.com&#8221;</p>
<p>I am a frequent Amazon.com user and I have been having a bit of a hard time getting used to it: I always log in (until I read this article) via &#8216;Your Account&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sedor</title>
		<link>http://www.designinginteractive.com/design/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sedor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designinginteractive.com/featured/amazoncom-redesigned-for-the-better/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I find it decidedly odd that you must select &quot;Personalized Recommendations&quot; rather than &quot;log-in&quot; to, um...LOG-IN. I admit I have never been a big fan of Amazon.com, but perhaps with the redesign (and a functioning log-in) I will revisit the matter this Holiday season.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it decidedly odd that you must select &#8220;Personalized Recommendations&#8221; rather than &#8220;log-in&#8221; to, um&#8230;LOG-IN. I admit I have never been a big fan of Amazon.com, but perhaps with the redesign (and a functioning log-in) I will revisit the matter this Holiday season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
